Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2018

First Advisor

Gary Senecal

Department

Psychology

Abstract

The majority of research in the field of sports psychology focuses on quantifiable, evidence-based, universally applicable theory. Current evidence-based programs of intervention are heavily based on symptomatology and often ignore the lived experiences of athletes; an unspoken assumption seems to exist that events, dialogue, and emotions will elicit identical responses from all athletes. Many clinicians find a large portion of their work focused on the subfields of mental imagery, motivation, emotions, and teamwork. Each topic has a dominating theory, which is typically derived from the concepts of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. While CBT certainly has its benefits, its shortcomings are evident in cases where the disposition and actions of athletes deviate from expectation. An extensive literature review can provide background on the aforementioned subfields, which allows for further development of theory that emphasizes the individuality of the athlete. The goal of this paper is to analyze the existing literature and reframe prevailing thought through an existential, phenomenological perspective. Through this research, it is hoped that a viable alternative to existing theory will be provided and a methodology will be developed that can enhance the field of sports psychology in education, research, and clinical application.

Comments

Faculty-sponsored research

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.